summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUlrike Uhlig <u@451f.org>2018-06-11 13:15:57 +0200
committerUlrike Uhlig <u@451f.org>2018-06-11 13:15:57 +0200
commit6d474993972bb1d01680a03e98bd5eb1be31a92b (patch)
tree48953e3630cc8f4c4542586d7e191d1dfb01079f
parent56f0e35c7946046a6b7d6cddb85459d42ebd7b11 (diff)
Update OTF report for May.
-rw-r--r--wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn24
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn b/wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn
index 820d13c..81ed1f6 100644
--- a/wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn
+++ b/wiki/src/blueprint/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn
@@ -9,11 +9,16 @@ Everything in this report is public.
# A. VeraCrypt support in GNOME
## A.5 Add VeraCrypt support to GNOME Disks
-Our merge request has been [merged](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-disk-utility/issues/84#note_222551) upstream so this deliverable is now completed.
+
+Our merge request has been
+[accepted](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-disk-utility/issues/84#note_222551)
+upstream, so this deliverable is now completed.
## A.10 Port to the latest version of GNOME
-We backported our glib, GTK+, GVfs, and GNOME Shell patches to the version we use in Tails and created Debian packages to use them in Tails ([#15521](https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15521#note-4)).
+We backported our glib, GTK+, GVfs, and GNOME Shell patches to the
+version we use in Tails and created Debian packages to use in Tails
+([#15521](https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15521#note-4)).
# B. Additional software
@@ -25,13 +30,13 @@ user testing.
## B.7 Beta release, user testing & community feedback
We [[published a beta version of the Additional Software feature and asked
-users to test it|news/test_asp-beta]]. Bugs and remarks from users have
-been collected on our bug tracker in order to improve them
-[[!tails_ticket 15567]].
+users to test it|news/test_asp-beta]]. Bugs and remarks from testers have
+been collected on our bug tracker in order to improve the implementation
+of the Additional Software feature [[!tails_ticket 15567]].
We also conducted and completed a user testing of the beta version.
-To this end, we organized an in-person moderated user testing with 5
+To this end, we organized an in-person moderated user testing with five
participants. We recruited participants who are in the target audience
for this feature: people who had tried Tails a few times but who were
not expert users.
@@ -43,8 +48,8 @@ Most issues are around the interface itself: they are integration issues
or issues in other parts of Tails, in GNOME, or in the navigation on our
website and documentation.
-The average SUS score is of 68 which is considered right on average compared to
-other industry products.
+The average SUS score is of 68 which is considered right on average
+compared to other industry products.
A more detailed report was sent to our UX mailing list:
@@ -53,6 +58,3 @@ A more detailed report was sent to our UX mailing list:
The full results are available in on UX Git repo (OTS spreadsheet):
<https://git.tails.boum.org/ux/plain/additional%20software/user_testing_results.fods>
-
-
-# C. Deliver new features