summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/wiki/src/contribute/reports/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'wiki/src/contribute/reports/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--wiki/src/contribute/reports/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn60
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/wiki/src/contribute/reports/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn b/wiki/src/contribute/reports/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..81ed1f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/wiki/src/contribute/reports/SponsorW/2018_05.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+[[!meta title="Tails May 2018 report"]]
+
+[[!toc levels=2]]
+
+This report covers the activity of Tails in May 2018.
+
+Everything in this report is public.
+
+# A. VeraCrypt support in GNOME
+
+## A.5 Add VeraCrypt support to GNOME Disks
+
+Our merge request has been
+[accepted](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-disk-utility/issues/84#note_222551)
+upstream, so this deliverable is now completed.
+
+## A.10 Port to the latest version of GNOME
+
+We backported our glib, GTK+, GVfs, and GNOME Shell patches to the
+version we use in Tails and created Debian packages to use in Tails
+([#15521](https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/15521#note-4)).
+
+# B. Additional software
+
+## B.6 User documentation
+
+We wrote a first draft of the documentation and it was tested during the
+user testing.
+
+## B.7 Beta release, user testing & community feedback
+
+We [[published a beta version of the Additional Software feature and asked
+users to test it|news/test_asp-beta]]. Bugs and remarks from testers have
+been collected on our bug tracker in order to improve the implementation
+of the Additional Software feature [[!tails_ticket 15567]].
+
+We also conducted and completed a user testing of the beta version.
+
+To this end, we organized an in-person moderated user testing with five
+participants. We recruited participants who are in the target audience
+for this feature: people who had tried Tails a few times but who were
+not expert users.
+
+The interface that we designed in January worked really well. Only one
+participant had a very bad time and failed some of the missions.
+
+Most issues are around the interface itself: they are integration issues
+or issues in other parts of Tails, in GNOME, or in the navigation on our
+website and documentation.
+
+The average SUS score is of 68 which is considered right on average
+compared to other industry products.
+
+A more detailed report was sent to our UX mailing list:
+
+<https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-ux/2018-May/003543.html>
+
+The full results are available in on UX Git repo (OTS spreadsheet):
+
+<https://git.tails.boum.org/ux/plain/additional%20software/user_testing_results.fods>